Jacques Barzun The Modern Researcher Pdf Writer
This classic introduction to the techniques of research and the art of expression is used widely in history courses, but is also appropriate for writing and research methods courses in other departments. Barzun and Graff thoroughly cover every aspect of research, from the selection of a topic through the gathering, analysis, writing, revision, and publication of findings p This classic introduction to the techniques of research and the art of expression is used widely in history courses, but is also appropriate for writing and research methods courses in other departments.
Barzun and Graff thoroughly cover every aspect of research, from the selection of a topic through the gathering, analysis, writing, revision, and publication of findings presenting the process not as a set of rules but through actual cases that put the subtleties of research in a useful context. Part One covers the principles and methods of research; Part Two covers writing, speaking, and getting one's work published. A useful text in many respects for the graduate student. The first chapter was especially insightful and even inspiring in its explanation of how and why we study history. It indirectly provides some particularly zesty counters for addressing and redirecting those who cling to the particularly pesky mantra of “those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it,” which has always bothered me, but I’ve never before had the verbal ammunition to overcome. Perhaps the greatest flaw of this work is t A useful text in many respects for the graduate student. The first chapter was especially insightful and even inspiring in its explanation of how and why we study history.
Visit Amazon.com's Jacques Barzun Page and shop for all Jacques Barzun books. The Modern Researcher Oct 8. And Modern (Phoenix Books) Aug 15, 1975. The Paperback of the The Modern Researcher by Jacques Barzun, Henry F. Graff at Barnes & Noble. FREE Shipping on $25 or more!
It indirectly provides some particularly zesty counters for addressing and redirecting those who cling to the particularly pesky mantra of “those who forget the past are condemned to repeat it,” which has always bothered me, but I’ve never before had the verbal ammunition to overcome. Perhaps the greatest flaw of this work is that it is now quite dated having been written in 1992. My professors did not specify an edition, and this is the one I purchased not realizing that there is a 6th ed., if not a 7th (if not, there probably will be soon). What a difference two decades makes in the technology sector. Card catalogues (p.48) are now on the extinct species list, and there are no longer conversations needed of weighing the pros and cons between deciding whether to write by hand, typewriter, or the 'word processor' (p.348-363). The foreboding tone of the conversation regarding the pros and cons of the 'so called 'laptop' (p.24) had me laughing aloud.
To be fair, I was unaware that laptops existed in 1992, so surely this book was at the cutting edge at the time of publication. Also long since resolved, is the problem of what to do with frail and aging materials as the great digitization projects have rendered this crisis moot. Surely too, will future editions of this work dispense with large portions of Chapter 4 'Finding the Facts', as Google and internal library search systems have thankfully replaced the cumbersome and time consuming days of hunting through various indexes in order to find the desired subject matter.
Technology aside, the weakest section in this work is Chapter 10 ' Plain Words.' It is a chapter of unqualified condescending drudgery, in which the authors leave the young writer to question the use and validity of every word he or she has ever committed to paper, while simultaneously managing to sound like the stereotypical 'Mean old Mr. Murphys' of the world who shake their collective canes at school children while shouting the inevitable 'You kids today.!' What is most curious is their particular tirade 'The State of Language Today,' regarding what they feel are improper uses for the words 'cohort' and 'testament' (p.
Questioning my own grasp of the English language, I picked up my dictionary to consult the entries. In both cases, the definition that the authors asserted was incorrect was listed as the secondary meaning of the word.
What made this finding more curious is that my dictionary (American Heritage published in 1963, well before this book) was in their footnote as one of two preferred dictionaries (p.229) that they recommended. In my mind this leaves three explanations for this rant: 1) the authors' do not like secondary definitions of words (possible); 2) the authors' did not bother to re-read the definitions (highly unlikely); 3) they were well-advanced in their careers and crotchety by the time this book was made and mid-chapter they had to grade a stack of freshman papers (my favorite option). Regardless, for me the effect was to weaken my impression of the remainder of their diatribes (of which there were many) for the duration of the next two chapters. This effect is unfortunate because the book is chock full of excellent recommendations and reminders about the necessity to be hyper vigilant with one’s writing. Perhaps most useful aspect about this work is that the authors have helpfully included tables and charts which explain various aspects of historical writing and shorthand that students learn casually without really ever knowing the meanings behind the abbreviations.
The Proofreader’s Marks (p.340), Roman Numerals and Their Use (p.303) and Common Abbreviations (p.306) are all of great value and highly convenient to have in one work. My recommendation would be to get this work, with the caveat of making certain that one has purchased the most recent edition available. With some works the changes matter very little, with this work the updates are essential.
The Modern Researcher was first published in 1957 and the most recent edition (#6) was published in 2001. I read the third edition (1977). The third edition examples of how to do research and how to use libraries are a little outdated especially the emphasis on the card catalogue and the lack of discussion on computers and internet usage.
I don't know if the most recent edition is modernized to cover computers and the internet. The book's greatest strength is how well it highlights the difference The Modern Researcher was first published in 1957 and the most recent edition (#6) was published in 2001. I read the third edition (1977). The third edition examples of how to do research and how to use libraries are a little outdated especially the emphasis on the card catalogue and the lack of discussion on computers and internet usage. I don't know if the most recent edition is modernized to cover computers and the internet. The book's greatest strength is how well it highlights the differences between facts and opinions and between copying and researching.
True research involves verifying facts (names and dates) and adding thoughts to these facts (opinions and conclusions). The book also covers the correct way to cite sources, including common errors with names and dates. Although I am no longer doing research in an academic setting, I still found the book both interesting and useful. I often do research for my book reviews and other blog posts. It was also a good reminder on how to spot opinion and bias in writing. I asked a history professor to recommend a book about how to do historical research, and got this.
I have to say I won't be passing the recommendation on. Here's what I liked: * Some of the sections on how to write well. There's a good reminder that although lots of words (especially verbs) can be used to mean the same thing, in fact they can be differentiated by their original meaning or by the image they are meant to evoke.
If you keep this in mind you will avoid mixed metaphors and write more e I asked a history professor to recommend a book about how to do historical research, and got this. I have to say I won't be passing the recommendation on. Here's what I liked: * Some of the sections on how to write well. There's a good reminder that although lots of words (especially verbs) can be used to mean the same thing, in fact they can be differentiated by their original meaning or by the image they are meant to evoke.
If you keep this in mind you will avoid mixed metaphors and write more effectively. Of course, this is advice I had already heard and had been trying to use, so I didn't quite learn anything from this section, and I found that some of the other sections on writing style were rather too elitist for my taste. * The advice about how to organize your handwritten notes (e.g.
How to make sure you don't lose any references) and how to organize yourself so that you keep working and get things done on time. The next time I have to write a major research paper I might borrow The Modern Researcher again just for that part.
* The tips on where to find different kinds of information in your library. Here's what I didn't like: * No notion of gender-neutral language. The first edition of this book was published in 1957, but the edition I was reading was from 2003. I think there are about two 'he or she's used and the rest of the time the Researcher or Historian is assumed to be male. Thanks very much, Professor. I would like a book that gives instructions on academic writing to tell the reader that it's now unprofessional to use the universal male pronoun., citing works that were all published before 2003.
* The reader is assumed to be in the United States and a native, or extremely fluent, English speaker. I don't think that's a dealbreaker, but I wish the authors had stated this premise at the beginning. * I was actually rather confused by the authors' idea of what history is, or what the people using this book would be trying to accomplish with their research. One of the very first things I learned about How To Think Like A Historian is that it's important to differentiate between primary and secondary sources.
Primary sources are things written or otherwise produced during the period you're studying. They probably don't directly answer the question you have, or summarize the situation, but they give clues and it's up to the historian to interpret them. Secondary sources are written after the fact, and usually have a bigger-picture, retrospective view of what happened.
Whereas the Declaration of Independence is a primary source to a historian studying the separation of the U.S. From Britain, a history book about the American Revolution is a secondary source. But one still has to be careful about secondary sources because their authors might have been missing important information, or might have some undisclosed bias.
There are also tertiary sources -- these are things like encyclopedias, whose authors don't usually rely directly on primary sources, but compile information from secondary sources into easily accessible summaries. The Modern Researcher doesn't explain the difference between primary and secondary sources until a footnote on page 81. This bemused me! Furthermore, The Modern Researcher gives very little advice about working with primary sources, and says almost nothing about the importance of caution when absorbing information from secondary sources. I remember one example about writing the biography of an important person.
The researcher reads all existing biographical material, plus secondary sources that mention the person, plus the person's letters, then puts all of this information in order. It's as though the authors aren't even considering the kind of work involved in researching the history of something that hasn't already been written about repeatedly -- let alone something that has little in the way of written sources. Oral history, what's that? * In fact, there's a section called 'Revisionism' that I think would have made me absolutely furious if I could have figured out what it was referring to.
I think it was discussing and condemning the kind of history that uses oral history and sociological methods to add the stories of poor, illiterate, and otherwise marginalized people to history normally centered around the wealthy and powerful. My conclusion is that this section has not been revised in the slightest since 1957.
So what I think this book is really intended for is people who are writing tertiary sources -- not actually adding anything to the body of historical knowledge, but simply compiling information that is already available. I was not impressed. There are newer editions of this classic book on the practice, ethics, and philosophy of writing history, and perhaps the special voice and wit of the original authors, polymath Jacques Barzun and Henry Graff, survives in them. But this edition (Fifth Edition, 1992), published when personal computers had gained a foothold in academic research but the internet had not, and libraries were still in the process of creating their online catalogues, preserves methods that are still necessary for schol There are newer editions of this classic book on the practice, ethics, and philosophy of writing history, and perhaps the special voice and wit of the original authors, polymath Jacques Barzun and Henry Graff, survives in them. But this edition (Fifth Edition, 1992), published when personal computers had gained a foothold in academic research but the internet had not, and libraries were still in the process of creating their online catalogues, preserves methods that are still necessary for scholars who want to go off the beaten path and find the valuable stuff that is not online.
The art of verifying and evaluating sources and detecting patterns, bias, and revisionism is given more than 100 pages, and these principles are increasingly necessary in everyday life now that so much of our news comes to us directly, without the mediation of professional journalism. The literary style is far more fun than the staid title would suggest. The 'kick-off' quote begins, 'My Illustrious Friend and Joy of My Liver! The thing you ask of me is both difficult and useless...' Just remembering my arranged marriage with this book in 1987 brought on the olfactory memory of card catalogs, bound periodical indexes, sour-faced university librarians, and the chalk-dusted Professor Briggs 'Twigs' Twyman, a savage and aggressive critic and, for me, perfect mentor. I'll never forget your backward praise of my paper on Custer's Last Stand while you were acerbically shouting down everyone else in my historiography seminar. I still haven't figured out your angry s Just remembering my arranged marriage with this book in 1987 brought on the olfactory memory of card catalogs, bound periodical indexes, sour-faced university librarians, and the chalk-dusted Professor Briggs 'Twigs' Twyman, a savage and aggressive critic and, for me, perfect mentor.
I'll never forget your backward praise of my paper on Custer's Last Stand while you were acerbically shouting down everyone else in my historiography seminar. I still haven't figured out your angry scrawls about my preposition use, but you made me a better writer.
Painting of Barzun titled With Light from a New Dawn, 1947 Born Jacques Martin Barzun ( 1907-11-30)November 30, 1907, Died October 25, 2012 ( 2012-10-25) (aged 104),, U.S. Occupation Historian Jacques Martin Barzun (November 30, 1907 – October 25, 2012) was a French-American known for his studies of the and.
He wrote about a wide range of subjects, including baseball, mystery novels, and classical music, and was also known as a. In the book Teacher in America (1945), Barzun influenced the training of schoolteachers in the United States. He published more than forty books, was awarded the American, and was dubbed a knight of the. The historical retrospective From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, 1500 to the Present (2000), widely considered his, was published when he was 93 years old. Contents • • • • • • • • Life [ ] Jacques Martin Barzun was born in, France, to Henri-Martin and Anna-Rose Barzun, and spent his childhood in and.
His father was a member of the group of artists and writers, and also worked in the. His parents' Paris home was frequented by many artists of France, such as the poet, the painters and, the composer, and the writers and. While on a diplomatic mission to the United States during the (1914–18), Barzun's father so liked the country he decided that his son should receive an American; thus, the twelve-year-old Jacques Martin attended a, then, where he obtained a. As an undergraduate at, Barzun was drama critic for the, a prize-winning president of the, the Columbia literary and debate club, and of the class of 1927. He obtained his Ph.D.
From Columbia in 1932 and taught history there from 1928 to 1955, becoming the Professor of History and a founder of the discipline of. For years, he and conducted Columbia's famous course. He was elected Fellow of the in 1954. From 1955 to 1968, he served as Dean of the Graduate School, Dean of Faculties, and, while also being an Extraordinary Fellow of at the.
From 1968 until his 1975 retirement, he was University Professor at Columbia. From 1951 to 1963 Barzun was one of the managing editors of, and its successor the (the other managing editors being and ), and afterwards was Literary Adviser to, 1975 to 1993. In 1936, Barzun married Mariana Lowell, a violinist from a.
Epson Printer 1390 Reset Software Free Download more. They had three children: James, Roger, and Isabel. Mariana died in 1979.
In 1980, Barzun married Marguerite Lee Davenport. Libro Aprendizaje Y Memoria Un Enfoque Integral Pdf Writer. From 1996 the Barzuns lived in her hometown,,. His granddaughter was a producer of the award-winning film.
His grandson,, is a businessman who served from 2009-2011 as the, and in 2013 was appointed. On May 14, 2012 Jacques Barzun attended a symphony performance in his honor at which works by his favorite composer,, were performed.
He attended in a wheelchair and delivered a brief address to the crowd. Barzun died peacefully at his home in, on October 25, 2012, aged 104., which compared him with such scholars as,, and, called him a 'distinguished historian, essayist, cultural gadfly and educator who helped establish the modern discipline of cultural history'. Naming, and as his intellectual ancestors, and calling him 'one of the West's most eminent historians of culture' and 'a champion of the liberal arts tradition in higher education,' who 'deplored what he called the 'gangrene of specialism', remarked, 'The sheer scope of his knowledge was extraordinary.
Barzun’s eye roamed over the full spectrum of Western music, art, literature and philosophy.' Essayist, remembering him in the as a 'flawless and magisterial' writer who tackled ',,,,,, composition, university teaching,, [and] the state of intellectual life', described Barzun as a tall, handsome man with an understated elegance, thoroughly Americanized, but retaining an air of old-world culture, cosmopolitan in an elegant way rare for intellectuals'. Career [ ] Over seven decades, Barzun wrote and edited more than forty books touching on an unusually broad range of subjects, including and, from through to modern methods, and, and; he was one of the all-time authorities on. Some of his books—particularly Teacher in America and The House of Intellect—enjoyed a substantial lay readership and influenced debate about culture and education far beyond the realm of academic history.
Barzun had a strong interest in the tools and mechanics of writing and. He undertook the task of completing, from a manuscript almost two-thirds of which was in first draft at the author's death, and editing (with the help of six other people), the first edition (published 1966) of. Barzun was also the author of books on ( Simple and Direct, 1975), on the crafts of and ( On Writing, Editing, and Publishing, 1971), and on in and the other ( The Modern Researcher, which has seen at least six editions). Barzun did not disdain popular culture: his varied interests included and. His widely quoted statement, 'Whoever wants to know the heart and mind of America had better learn baseball.' Was inscribed on a plaque at the.
He edited and wrote the introduction to the 1961 anthology, The Delights of Detection, which included stories by,,, and others. In 1971, Barzun co-authored (with Wendell Hertig Taylor),: Being a Reader's Guide to the Literature of Mystery, Detection, & Related Genres, for which he and his co-author received a Special from the the following year. Barzun was also an advocate of, and wrote the introduction to. Barzun was a proponent of the theatre critic and diarist, whom he compared in stature to. Barzun edited Agate's last two diaries into a new edition in 1951 and wrote an informative introductory essay, 'Agate and His Nine Egos'.
From Dawn to Decadence by Jacques Barzun Jacques Barzun continued to write on education and cultural history after retiring from Columbia. At 84 years of age, he began writing his, to which he devoted the better part of the 1990s.
The resulting book of more than 800 pages, From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, 1500 to the Present, revealed a vast erudition and brilliance undimmed by advanced age. Historians, literary critics, and popular reviewers all lauded From Dawn to Decadence as a sweeping and powerful survey of modern Western history, and it became a bestseller. With this work he gained an international reputation. The book introduces several novel devices that aid an unusually rich system of cross-referencing and help keep many strands of thought in the book under organized control. Most pages feature a containing a pithy quotation, usually little known, and often surprising or humorous, from some author or historical figure.
In 2007, Barzun commented that 'Old age is like learning a new profession. And not one of your own choosing.' As late as October 2011, one month before his 104th birthday, he reviewed 's Why Trilling Matters for the. In his philosophy of writing history, Barzun emphasized the role of storytelling over the use of academic jargon and detached analysis.
He concluded in From Dawn to Decadence that 'history cannot be a science; it is the very opposite, in that its interest resides in the particulars.' Recognition [ ] In 1968, Barzun received the from the Library Associates. Barzun was appointed a Chevalier of the National Order of the. In 2003, he was awarded the by President. In 1993, his book 'An Essay on French Verse: For Readers of English Poetry' won the 's Melville Cane Poetry Award. On October 18, 2007, he received the 59th Great Teacher Award of the Society of Columbia Graduates. On March 2, 2011, Barzun was awarded the 2010 by President, although he was not expected to be in attendance.
On April 16, 2011, he received the Philolexian Award for Distinguished Literary Achievement in absentia. The honors Barzun with its Jacques Barzun Prize in Cultural History, awarded annually since 1993 to the author of a recent distinguished work of cultural history. He also received the Gold Medal for Criticism from the, of which he was twice president.
Works [ ] • 1927 Samplings and Chronicles: Being the Continuation of the Philolexian Society History, with Literary Selections From 1912 to 1927 (editor). Philolexian Society. • 1932 The French Race: Theories of Its Origins and Their Social and Political Implications. • 1937 Race: a Study in Modern Superstition (Revised, 1965 Race: A Study in Superstition). Methuen & Co. • 1939 Of Human Freedom.
Revised edition, Greenwood Press Reprint, 1977:. • 1941 Darwin, Marx, Wagner: Critique of a Heritage.. • 1943 Romanticism and the Modern Ego. Boston, Little, Brown and Company, 1943. • 1945 Teacher in America. Reprint Liberty Fund, 1981.. • 1950 Berlioz and the Romantic Century.
Boston: Little, Brown and Company/An Atlantic Monthly Press Book, 1950 [2 vols.]. • 1951 Pleasures of Music: a Reader's Choice of Great Writing About Music and Musicians From Cellini to Bernard Shaw Viking Press.
• 1954 God's Country and Mine: A Declaration of Love, Spiced with a Few Harsh Words. Reprint Greenwood Press, 1973:. • 1956 Music in American Life. Indiana University Press. • 1956 The Energies of Art: Studies of Authors, Classic and Modern. • 1959 The House of Intellect. Reprint Harper Perennial, 2002:.
• 1960 Lincoln the Literary Genius (first published in, February 14, 1959) • 1961 The Delights of Detection. Criterion Books.
• 1961 Classic, Romantic, and Modern. Reprint University Of Chicago Press, 1975:. • 1964 Science: The Glorious Entertainment. • 1967 What Man Has Built (introductory booklet to the Great Ages of Man book series). • 1968 The American University: How It Runs, Where It Is Going.
Reprint University Of Chicago Press, 1993:. • 1969 Berlioz and the Romantic Century (3d ed.). • 1971 On Writing, Editing, and Publishing. University of Chicago Press. • 1971 (with Wendell Hertig Taylor). Revised edition, Harper & Row, 1989:. • 1974 Clio and the Doctors.
Reprinted University Of Chicago Press, 1993:. • 1974 The Use and Abuse of Art ( in the Fine Arts). Princeton University Press.. • 1975 Simple and Direct: A Rhetoric for Writers. 4th ed, Harper Perennial, 2001:.
• 1976 The Bibliophile of the Future: His Complaints about the Twentieth Century (Maury A. Bromsen lecture in humanistic bibliography). Boston Public Library.. • 1980 Three Talks at Northern Kentucky University. Northern Kentucky University, Dept. Of Literature and Language.
• 1982 Lincoln's Philosophic Vision. Artichokes Creative Studios. • 1982 Critical Questions: On Music and Letters, Culture and Biography, 1940–1980 (edited by Bea Friedland). University Of Chicago Press..
• 1982 Berlioz and His Century: An Introduction to the Age of Romanticism (Abridgment of Berlioz and the Romantic Century). University Of Chicago Press.. • 1983 A Stroll with William James. Reprint University of Chicago Press, 2002:.
• 1986 A Word or Two Before You Go: Brief Essays on Language. Wesleyan University. • 1989 The Culture We Deserve: A Critique of Disenlightenment. Wesleyan University.. • 1991 An Essay on French Verse: For Readers of English Poetry.
New Directions Publishing.. • 1991 Begin Here: The Forgotten Conditions of Teaching and Learning.
University Of Chicago Press.. • 2000 From Dawn to Decadence: 500 Years of Western Cultural Life, 1500 to the Present.. • 2001 Sidelights on Opera at Glimmerglass. Glimmerglass Opera • 2002 A Jacques Barzun Reader.. • 2002 What is a School?
And Trim the College! ( What is a School? An Institution in Limbo, Trim the College! Hudson Institute.
• 2003 The Modern Researcher (6th ed.) (with Henry F. Wadsworth Publishing.. • 2004 Four More Sidelights on Opera at Glimmerglass: 2001–2004 See also [ ].